Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Firebird Performance |
---|---|
Author | Anderson Farias |
Post date | 2009-04-15T00:46:53Z |
Hi,
except with only 2 and 4Gb of RAM), Win2k amd Win2k3, one of then with 200+
concurrent connections and about 4 to 6 databases. Classic performs a *lot*
better than SS.
Regards,
Anderson Farias
>Articles say the Classic Version of Firebird runs better thanYes, believe me. I've seen at least 2 enviroment like yours (same servers
>superserver in this case. Is quit so?
except with only 2 and 4Gb of RAM), Win2k amd Win2k3, one of then with 200+
concurrent connections and about 4 to 6 databases. Classic performs a *lot*
better than SS.
Regards,
Anderson Farias