Kjell Rilbe wrote:

> But is it a bug?
>
> I thought this was as designed? I seem to recall that the system table

> holds max 31 8 byte characters, and if a different character encoding

is

> used, the max length depends on hos many bytes each "codepoint"

requires.

>
> If it really is a bug, then of course I'd like to submit it to get it
> fixed, but I'm hoping someone can say if it is a bug or not...?

FYI, a tracker case was opened quite a while ago for this issue, to
extend the size of database object names.


Sean