jegazarco wrote:

>> 75. I did some benchmarking some time ago and Linux kernel fs cache
>> works about 10% faster than Firebird page cache, so there is really no
>> point using FB page cache unless you are storing the data on raw device.
>
> have you done some test in Windows server?

No. I rarely run FB on Windows. Maybe someone else will have some data
for it.


--
Milan Babuskov

==================================
The easiest way to import XML, CSV
and textual files into Firebird:
http://www.guacosoft.com/xmlwizard
==================================