Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Re: Raid 0 or not ? |
---|---|
Author | Calin Pirtea |
Post date | 2009-11-18T07:57:10Z |
Hi Stephane,
I've been using Raid0 on development machines and yes it is really that
much faster. As for HDD failures I am amazed in 15 years you never saw
disks completely crash. I've seen at least one every year running around
50 servers.
Cheers,
Calin Pirtea
From: svanderclock
Sent: Wednesday, 18 November 2009 3:50 PM
To
"speed" not un reliability the difference between a raid 0 and a raid 1.
is it really twice more faster and in this way really usefull to use it
(but in this way the data will need to be backuped or mirrored all the
time)
stephane
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I've been using Raid0 on development machines and yes it is really that
much faster. As for HDD failures I am amazed in 15 years you never saw
disks completely crash. I've seen at least one every year running around
50 servers.
Cheers,
Calin Pirtea
From: svanderclock
Sent: Wednesday, 18 November 2009 3:50 PM
To
> Well...no i take care about the security, but here the question was to know in
>
> If you don't care about security, you can use a RAM DISK, or even read
> /dev/rand :)
>
"speed" not un reliability the difference between a raid 0 and a raid 1.
is it really twice more faster and in this way really usefull to use it
(but in this way the data will need to be backuped or mirrored all the
time)
stephane
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]