Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Oldest transaction |
---|---|
Author | Alan McDonald |
Post date | 2009-10-15T09:35:22Z |
> Hi list !,autocommit? which component set arew you using? Is this really
>
> A while ago I mentioned some customers have poor performance,
> especially when > 20 connections. I'm aware of the fact that there is
> a design problem, I just can't figure out what exactly.
> I checked with gstat and saw the following (probably disturbing
> numbers) :
>
> Oldest transaction : 91891
> Oldest active : 2956068
> Oldest snapshot : 2956068
> Next transaction : 2956086
>
> I guess the gap between Oldest en Next transaction is way too big ? Am
> I right ? After doing a sweep, the Oldest and Next become equal.
> I've read some articles on IBPhoenix, but I don't quite understand it.
> And I don't know what is causing that giant gap between Oldest and
> Next. All queries are set to AutoCommit, so when a record is
CommitRetaining?
Alan
> inserted/updated, the transaction is committed. Or am I missing
> something ?
>
> Many thanks in advance,
> Nico