Leyne, Sean wrote:

>
>> all provided here and there 10 days ago. And I confirm the simple test
>> proves it. It's a show stopper when accessing the MON tables in
>> production.
>
> While I agree that the test does highlight the problem, I think the test case is a little extreme -- continuously querying the MON$ tables over and over...
>
> This suggests an abuse of what the MON$ tables were designed for.

I think you are confusing a reproduction recipe or testcase that clearly
illustrate the problem with actual usage where the problem also exists,
but is less visible in the short term.

A reproduction recipe does not have to confirm to actual production
usage, it has to zoom in at the problem at hand.

Mark
--
Mark Rotteveel