No, It was dialect 3 (as far as I know).
Ok, I'll open a testcase.

Dmitry Yemanov wrote:

>
> Andrew wrote:
>
> > But the exception exists and I suppose that it broke many parts of my
> > applications after the migration from 2.0 to 2.1.
>
> A test case would be appreciated. At least two of us cannot reproduce
> this issue. Do you use a Dialect 1 database?
>
> Dmitry
>
> __._,_.__

> _