Olivier Mascia wrote:

> Kjell Rilbe a écrit :
>
> This is absolutely not wanting CHAR to behave like VARCHAR. With all
> non-variable length charsets, the reported count of significant bytes
> in the buffer will be the buffer length. With UTF8 (is there another
> one concerned?) that count may be lower than the buffer length.

I guess UTF16 has the same problem using surrogate pairs, but Firebird
doesn't support UTF16, does it?

Kjell
--
--------------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
DataDIA AB
E-post: kjell@...
Telefon: 08-761 06 55
Mobil: 0733-44 24 64