Subject | Re: Blob - Invalid segment size |
---|---|
Author | inoffensive_2006 |
Post date | 2008-06-02T23:15:41Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@...> wrote:
has some kind of logical error occurring when you have a blob that is
close to the upper boundary of the size limit on the buffer IBPP is
using to pass blob streams across the wire.
Thanks Helen:
I didn't realize that this is an error originated with IBPP.
It's hard for me to tell.
From Firebird's perspective, can any amount of data be written
to a blob in a single operation? Without segmenting it?
Thanks, for all your advice in this group and for your very
nice book.
Larry
>applications (ie.
> At 04:09 AM 3/06/2008, inoffensive_2006 wrote:
>
> >> The "Segment Size" value is no longer of any real significance for
> >> modern applications, it is for support of real legacy
> >> ancient).raising this problem in the IBPP forum? It looks possible that IBPP
> >>
> >> A value of 80 is fine for all purposes.
> >
> >Thanks Sean:
> >
> > So, why does this:
> >
> > CON_IMAGE BLOB SUB_TYPE 0 SEGMENT SIZE 80
> >
> > Result in this?
> >
> > Context: Blob::Write
> > Message: Invalid segment size (max 64Kb-1)
> >
> > If segment size isn't an issue, why does Firebird even
> >have this error message?
>
> Firebird doesn't have this error message. Have you considered
has some kind of logical error occurring when you have a blob that is
close to the upper boundary of the size limit on the buffer IBPP is
using to pass blob streams across the wire.
Thanks Helen:
I didn't realize that this is an error originated with IBPP.
It's hard for me to tell.
From Firebird's perspective, can any amount of data be written
to a blob in a single operation? Without segmenting it?
Thanks, for all your advice in this group and for your very
nice book.
Larry