Subject | Re: What's the difference between "Gbak -g" and "gFix -sweep" |
---|---|
Author | svanderclock |
Post date | 2008-05-05T17:38:06Z |
Ok, so in conclusion doing everyweek (cause everydays i can't too
long process that slow down the database)
First
fgix -sweep
and immediatly after
gbak (without -g)
it's a good practice? everyone agree ?
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Philippe Makowski
<makowski@...> wrote:
long process that slow down the database)
First
fgix -sweep
and immediatly after
gbak (without -g)
it's a good practice? everyone agree ?
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Philippe Makowski
<makowski@...> wrote:
>without -g (that will
> Ivan Prenosil [08-05-05 19.00] :
> >> no, in normal use, you don't need to do a sweep if you run gbak
> >> collect the garbage)have a lot of rollbacked
> >>
> >> The only case you will eventualy need to run a sweep is if you
> >> transactionsperformance problems
> >
> > Not exactly. Even single rollbacked transaction is enough to get
> > (starting of new transactions will get slower and slower).immediately to commited ones,
> >
> > However, rollbacked transactions are usually converted
> > except some special cases (forced disconnection, too much updatesin one transaction,
> > forbiding undo log in tpb etc.).lot of rollbacked
>
> Yes, I should write "a large set of data rollbacked" instead of "a
> transactions"transactions.
> or I should write in French to Stephane ;)
>
> > Sweep (or backup/restore) is also the only cure for limbo
> >
> of course
>