>
> "
>
> What I actually meant is that if you have a non-standard feature in an
>
> RDBMS, you shouldn't expect it to exist on all RDBMSs, which is the
>
> case of updates with joins. Even though MySQL and Access have
>
> implemented it, it doesn't mean that other RDBMSs will accept the
>
> syntax as it is. You will have to find out how to implement it your
>
> target RDBMS, which in the current example you have provided is the
>
> equivalent to the update with joins.
>
>
> Fidel."
>

"Therefore FB 2.1 implemens standard MERGE statement."

It will be a good answer for this problem ;)

eMeL

> __
>