Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: How to implement SQLServer's WITH(NOLOCK) |
---|---|
Author | Dmitry Yemanov |
Post date | 2008-04-14T17:32:25Z |
Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
isn't it? I even remember myself proposing to change the default
behavior, but someone objected in favor of backward compatibility. Sigh.
Dmitry
>Me neither (a few years ago) :-) Quite unexpected from a MGA engine,
> To be honest, I wasn't aware that a READ COMMITTED transaction
> *defaults* to NO_RECORD_VERSION.
isn't it? I even remember myself proposing to change the default
behavior, but someone objected in favor of backward compatibility. Sigh.
Dmitry