Hi Dean,

I have 200 constant connections from 7am to 8pm, and I can see the 200 users
via IBExpert, I have assigned 65K pages of 16K for cache. It's pretty fast,
however if I go to CS I would en up with:

16 Giga on the Linux server , divided by 200 users = 80 Megabytes per user,
that will be pretty slow for a 2 Giga database don't you think?

Fabian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dean Harding" <dean.harding@...>
To: <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Choosing Firebird Version and Server OS and
bits (32 or 64)


> Fabian Chocron wrote:
>> > As of my personal experience, go with Classic. On all my deployments
>> over
>> > Windows2003/SMP XEON is lightening faster than SS
>> Thanks Anderson, isn't it the case that with 200 users I would be better
>> off
>> running a SS version because of Cache memory?
>
> It depends on how your application connects to the database. The actual
> important number is not the number of "users" but the number of
> *simultaneous connections* your application(s) make -- one connection =
> one server process.
>
> Dean.
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Resources item
> on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !
>
> Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>