> As of my personal experience, go with Classic. On all my deployments over
> Windows2003/SMP XEON is lightening faster than SS

Thanks Anderson, isn't it the case that with 200 users I would be better off
running a SS version because of Cache memory?

Fabian

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anderson Farias" <peixedragao@...>
To: <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Choosing Firebird Version and Server OS and
bits (32 or 64)


> Hi,
>
>
>> And between FB 2.0 or 2.1, what version would you choose and why?
>
> Note that although almost a final release, v2.1 is still 'release
> candidade'
> so, in theory, should not be used on production sites!
>
> As of my personal experience, go with Classic. On all my deployments over
> Windows2003/SMP XEON is lightining faster than SS
>
> Regards,
> Anderson Farias
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Resources item
> on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !
>
> Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>