Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: how to determine User role |
---|---|
Author | Anderson Farias |
Post date | 2008-03-31T02:48:59Z |
Hi Doug,
Having to select a 'hat' before your 'journey' (some times without even
knowing what the options are, look at the message that originated this
thread) IS NOT better at all than having all your "granted" hats with you
during your journey (connection) so you can use the one you need without
having to go all the way back and start a new 'journey' when find out you
need some other 'hat'.
IMHO, the concept of ROLES *could* change to something more 'smart', a
'server side only' feature, transparent for the client which whould'n have
to know anything about it (like it's names). And users would have all it's
granted rights without having to logoff/login (if I have the right, WHY
should I have to do that?? There's no logic on that!)
I'm not saying it's wrong, I understand how it works and IMO, it can (and
should) be *enhanced* -- by the time it gets important enougth to get into
FB development tight schedule already full of great and (probably) more
important enhancements.
Regards,
Anderson Farias
> The fact that I have been granted the ability to use these roles at anyActually I understand that. My point is that I find this concept *limited*.
> time does not mean I can connect and use the abilities they grant me all
> at once during the same connection. I still have to pick in which role I
> will be acting each time I connect.
> Roles are not groups that my username belongs to and from which my
> account inherits rights. That is a different concept (although for other
> products it may go under the name of "roles").
Having to select a 'hat' before your 'journey' (some times without even
knowing what the options are, look at the message that originated this
thread) IS NOT better at all than having all your "granted" hats with you
during your journey (connection) so you can use the one you need without
having to go all the way back and start a new 'journey' when find out you
need some other 'hat'.
IMHO, the concept of ROLES *could* change to something more 'smart', a
'server side only' feature, transparent for the client which whould'n have
to know anything about it (like it's names). And users would have all it's
granted rights without having to logoff/login (if I have the right, WHY
should I have to do that?? There's no logic on that!)
I'm not saying it's wrong, I understand how it works and IMO, it can (and
should) be *enhanced* -- by the time it gets important enougth to get into
FB development tight schedule already full of great and (probably) more
important enhancements.
Regards,
Anderson Farias