Subject | Re: Newbie: Query speed and DB size |
---|---|
Author | kogerbnz |
Post date | 2008-03-27T10:09:15Z |
Thanks for your answer, also thank you Adam!
I'll try to give you the missing pieces.
always contain one row.
I'm not expecting an exact answer, I'm just trying to get a little
feeling with how the DB would perform.
Which would guide me when deciding if I should try optimize my design
to use fewer queries, but giving a bit messier table design.
I will do the same query as described previously, querying on PK and
only getting one row in return.
Thank you very much again
I'll try to give you the missing pieces.
> > 1) Does the query speed depend on the number of rows in a table?Yes
> Does you query specify criteria where all the columns are indexed?
> How specific is the value being searched for?Very specific, I'm querying on the primary key, so the result would
always contain one row.
> Does the query need to evaluate across indexes?No
> > 3) OK, I know this is a vague question.Windows, IDE HD, no raid, and of course not 2MHZ CPU ;-)
> > On a "normal" desktop computer say 2MHz and 2GB RAM or something like
> > it. How many simple queries (like select * from table) can I make in a
> > second. Is it in the 100's, 1000's etc.?
> Simple queries like that are no measure of anything in real life!
> How many columns are there? How big are the records?
>
> Is the HD: IDE, SATA 1.5Gbps, SATA 3.0Gbps, SCSI, SAS 10K or SAS 15K?
>
> Is there a RAID controller? Does the RAID controller have cache?
>
> Is the PC running Windows or Linux? What is the file system of the
> drive/device that the database is stored on?
I'm not expecting an exact answer, I'm just trying to get a little
feeling with how the DB would perform.
Which would guide me when deciding if I should try optimize my design
to use fewer queries, but giving a bit messier table design.
I will do the same query as described previously, querying on PK and
only getting one row in return.
Thank you very much again