> without modification. Now, I was analysing why I would use Fyracle
> instead of Firebird. Fyracle is nothing but Firebird with Oracle
> compatibilities. It isn't more scalable, or faster than Firebird, I
> suppose. So why would I use Fyracle instead of Firebird?

Personally, I would only use Fyracle if I needed to port a legacy
application to Firebird.

Pepa Kokes