Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Having one big table in a separate file ? |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2008-11-29T19:41:57Z |
Charles-Henri Balet wrote:
a file by itself unless you use external tables and the
available external table implementations don't support
blobs.
in a different file is a good idea?
Best,
Ann
> Hello,Basically, no, you can't force a single table to be in
>
> I use firebird 2.1 and one of the table of my dev,
> store binary files and grow quickly, my question, is able
> firebird to support of split of database and link
> this table in another file (I want to have only one table in
> another file but that make integrate part of my
> database like an external table but read that external table
> can't use binary blob)
a file by itself unless you use external tables and the
available external table implementations don't support
blobs.
>I guess my question is why you think that having one table
>
> I have stored procedure that use
> this table and want to keep them in the main file....
> my goal is only hat have a table (or more and functions)
> that are stored in multiples files but keep one database
>
in a different file is a good idea?
Best,
Ann