> So do you understand that a Classic
> client process sees only the user that
> is involved with *its* connection to the server?

Yes, thanks, I do now.
Pity that this information is not simply just held
in the database.

RBS

> At 16:34 7/10/2008, you wrote:
>>> And, with Classic, you will get one user back - being the one that is
>>running the process from which the request was made.
>>
>> Yes, we are on Classic and that is exactly what I am seeing.
>
> So do you understand that a Classic client process sees only the user that
> is involved with *its* connection to the server? Superserver, being one
> multi-threaded process serving all users, sees all users that are
> connected...
>
> I *think* the new "superclassic" model coming in 2.5 should see all users,
> too, although I haven't experimented with it in the alpha.
>
> ./heLen
>
>