Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: usable characters for varchar and memos |
---|---|
Author | Milan Babuskov |
Post date | 2008-01-31T11:04:58Z |
Ed Dressel wrote:
I have some databases with charset WIN1250 for most of the data, and
some 'special' columns are explicitly defined as OCTETS. Nothing wrong
with that.
WIN1252 or ISO8859_1. For encrypted columns, use OCTETS.
--
Milan Babuskov
http://www.flamerobin.org
>> Octets will allow 0x0 bytes, and that's what I wouldYou *don\t* have to have the same character set for entire database!
>> use for encrypted data. The fact that zeros are the pad
>> character doesn't matter - most character sets use space
>> as a pad - that doesn't make space an illegal character.
>
> Thanks.
>
> What is the cost/loss of moving from NONE to Octets?
I have some databases with charset WIN1250 for most of the data, and
some 'special' columns are explicitly defined as OCTETS. Nothing wrong
with that.
> Note that some databases may not have their data encrypted, othersFor non-encrypted columns, use the most appropriate charset, for example
> will. So will an un-encrypted database have the ability to sort?
WIN1252 or ISO8859_1. For encrypted columns, use OCTETS.
--
Milan Babuskov
http://www.flamerobin.org