Subject Re: firebird classic on windowx 2000|xp|2003
Author mohamed.banaouas
thanks a lot for your feedback.
On SuperServer, I usually set DefaultDbCachePages=20480 corresponding
to 80 Mo ram. Application access to only one database. There is up to
100 concurrent connexions.
The server has 4 Go RAM.
Should I keep the same value on classic ?

--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Anderson Farias"
<peixedragao@...> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Using classic you'll have 1 fb_inet_server for each client
connection (not
> for each statemant) plus 1 (the 'listener' service)
>
> I've been using Classic over Windows 2003 on about 3 sites for some time
> now. In my experience it's a *lot* better/faster than SS if you're
running
> on a SMP box. And memory is not an issue, you'll usually need more
then with
> SS but not that much.
>
> The only "bad" is that it *seems* each instance does not kill itself
when
> the client have lost connection (eg. crashed), even after some big
time. And
> I'm not sure database shutdown works fine too.
>
> But, usually u can live with it ;-)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mohamed.banaouas"
>
>
> Our application (client-side) maintain opened the firebird connection
> during all the user session, so I think there is no need to lunch
> fbserver copy any moore ? Unless the lunch concerns each query...
> I asked the question about windows/classic because I did't notices
> many threads about it. I'm really interested on feedback about such
> association.
>
> thanks in advance
>