Subject | Re: Max length of SQL statement |
---|---|
Author | Tom Conlon |
Post date | 2007-06-20T14:09:10Z |
> Not a bad idea, but writing 1500+ entries to a table is going toNo, in my experience it is simply not a problem.
> cause quite a performance hit. This would be a good place to use a
> temporary, in memory table if Firebird supported such a thing.
(Plus, in memory table would still needs to be populated)
Regards,
Tom