Subject RE: [firebird-support] Does 2.0.3.12981 version requires smaller instead or bigger index keys? ref/eDN6063215442
Author dennis
Database "C:\fd\prg\front\db\DB_FB.FDB"

Database header page information:

Flags 0

Checksum 12345

Generation 398322

Page size 1024

ODS version 11.0

Oldest transaction 380485

Oldest active 397416

Oldest snapshot 397416

Next transaction 398308

Bumped transaction 1

Sequence number 0

Next attachment ID 0

Implementation ID 16

Shadow count 0

Page buffers 0

Next header page 0

Database dialect 3

Creation date Mar 26, 2007 12:09:37

Attributes force write



Variable header data:

Sweep interval: 20000

*END*



Deninis





From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Vlad Khorsun
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 11:53 AM
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Does 2.0.3.12981 version requires smaller
instead or bigger index keys? ref/eDN6063215442



> I was working with version 2.0.0.12748 and now with version 2.0.3.12981
the
> follow index cannot be creatred:
>
> CREATE INDEX CODES_IDX2 ON CODES (KEY_, RES_);
>
>
>
> The error message is:
>
> This operation is not defined for system tables.
>
> unsuccessful metadata update.
>
> key size exceeds implementation restriction for index "CODES_IDX2".
>
>
>
> Key_ and res_ fields are varchar(100),
>
>
>
> Character set: DEFAULT CHARACTER SET NONE
>
>
>
> What happen? Does 2.0.3.12981 version requires smaller instead or bigger
> index keys? Where am I wrong?

What is ODS and page size of your database ? (gstat -h will tell you)

Regards,
Vlad





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]