Subject | Re: Restore FB2 problem |
---|---|
Author | hanszorn2000 |
Post date | 2007-10-22T10:02:02Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "hanszorn2000" <hanszorn@...>
wrote:
'metadata only' backup of the database, using the -m switch with the
backup command.
Now I suppose a metadata-only backup is just another way of storing
the ddl for the database. But the ddl for the database does not
contain the word 'plan' at all. So is this a bug? I really hope
someone can help me.
Thanks, Hans
wrote:
>A little addition to this: the problem even occurs when I restore a
> When doing a restore from a FB 1.5 database backup, I get the error
> message 'table ... is not referenced in plan'.
> Now I found the remarks in the release notes concerning this situation:
>
> "Stricter validation of user-specified plans
> User-specified plans are validated more strictly than they were
> formerly. If you encounter an exception
> related to plans, e.g. Table T is not referenced in plan, it will be
> necessary to inspect your
> procedure and trigger sources and adjust the plans to make them
> semantically correct."
>
> "Important:
> Such errors could also show up during the restore process when you are
> migrating databases to the new
> version. It will be necessary to correct these conditions in original
> database before you attempt to perform
> a backup/restore cycle."
>
> The only thing is: there are no explicit plans in my entire database.
> So how can I correct this issue?
>
> Thanks, Hans
>
'metadata only' backup of the database, using the -m switch with the
backup command.
Now I suppose a metadata-only backup is just another way of storing
the ddl for the database. But the ddl for the database does not
contain the word 'plan' at all. So is this a bug? I really hope
someone can help me.
Thanks, Hans