Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Error 10038 |
---|---|
Author | Tim |
Post date | 2006-09-12T09:11:36Z |
Hi Stefan,
Erm ... well ....
Interbase works well for us. We don't so anything sophisticated. And
this error seems to be quite rare. (googeling produced very few
results) I am not so sure it is an IB error.
And the problem does not occur at all sites.
Nevertheless - I have already been nagging for two years for us to
move to Firebird. :D
all the development work is done on Firebird. I like Firebird. Like
Interbase, it just ...... works. :D
Thanks
Tim
At 11:05 12/09/2006, you wrote:
Erm ... well ....
Interbase works well for us. We don't so anything sophisticated. And
this error seems to be quite rare. (googeling produced very few
results) I am not so sure it is an IB error.
And the problem does not occur at all sites.
Nevertheless - I have already been nagging for two years for us to
move to Firebird. :D
all the development work is done on Firebird. I like Firebird. Like
Interbase, it just ...... works. :D
Thanks
Tim
At 11:05 12/09/2006, you wrote:
>Tim,[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> > From the Interbase log file :
>
> > FORECOURT (Server) Tue Sep 05 15:36:45 2006
> > INET/inet_error: select in packet_receive errno = 10038
>
>As you can see here:
><http://www.destructor.de/firebird/winsockerrors.htm>http://www.destructor.de/firebird/winsockerrors.htm
>error #10038 means "Socket operation on non-socket". So the InterBase
>network module tries to work with a wrong socket handle. Which looks
>like a serious bug to me.
>
> > Interbase 6.0.2.0
>
>Is there any chance you can upgrade to at least Firebird 1.0.3? It
>should be backwards compatible enough. You should even be able to just
>continue to use the .gdb file (even though I would strongly recommend
>to go through a backup & restore cycle and use another extension like
>.fdb).
>
>Best Regards
>
>Stefan
>
>--
>Stefan Heymann
>www.destructor.de/firebird
>
>