Subject | Re: Management Tool specific |
---|---|
Author | bmckenna6 |
Post date | 2006-08-19T19:54:47Z |
Adam,
Thanks for particpating in this 'dialog' with myself <g>.
I forgot to mention that all add'l tables would have the
same exact structure and use a common generator.
Still a bit new to relational db concepts, I now realize,
in part by my 'explaining' back to you what I forgot
to include in my original post, that I can add an add'l
integer field, tie that to a small and simple TableCaptions
table, and use the (new to me) concept of Views, which
will be much more efficient and now only require the
one table.
<g> Is this what they mean by normalizing the data?
Thanks for particpating in this 'dialog' with myself <g>.
I forgot to mention that all add'l tables would have the
same exact structure and use a common generator.
Still a bit new to relational db concepts, I now realize,
in part by my 'explaining' back to you what I forgot
to include in my original post, that I can add an add'l
integer field, tie that to a small and simple TableCaptions
table, and use the (new to me) concept of Views, which
will be much more efficient and now only require the
one table.
<g> Is this what they mean by normalizing the data?