Subject | Re: [firebird-support] create table as select |
---|---|
Author | Nando Dessena |
Post date | 2006-07-17T11:25:52Z |
Alan,
A> well I'm all for switches that make for more common sense. If MS can say "OK
A> that's the standards... but users want X so we'll give it to them", why
A> can't FB? Let teh standards compliant die-hards have their way but let the
A> bulk of users have their's as well.
AFAIK users are fine with "is distinct from". Some would use a more
compact form, but at least the feature's there. Perhaps the same could
be said about the "create table as select" feature? After all the
feature is there: you can create tables and certainly you can select
already. :-)
Ciao
--
Nando Dessena
======================================================
I support Firebird, I am a Firebird Foundation member!
Join today at http://www.firebirdsql.org/ff/foundation
======================================================
A> well I'm all for switches that make for more common sense. If MS can say "OK
A> that's the standards... but users want X so we'll give it to them", why
A> can't FB? Let teh standards compliant die-hards have their way but let the
A> bulk of users have their's as well.
AFAIK users are fine with "is distinct from". Some would use a more
compact form, but at least the feature's there. Perhaps the same could
be said about the "create table as select" feature? After all the
feature is there: you can create tables and certainly you can select
already. :-)
Ciao
--
Nando Dessena
======================================================
I support Firebird, I am a Firebird Foundation member!
Join today at http://www.firebirdsql.org/ff/foundation
======================================================