Subject | Re: Record numbering |
---|---|
Author | Ali Gökçen |
Post date | 2006-07-14T10:07:05Z |
Hi Martijn,
i never wrote any singleuser/standalone application in my life,
so i never faced with single-user safety. ;)
here is what i said:
because of users and terminals are limited and manageble, there is no
so much risk about generator table overflow and one time used zombie
generators.
the only soft-risc is a local problem:
user may run more than one numarator based query at the same time.
a clever programmer can solve this problem without panic i think...
Regards.
Ali
FFM#208
i never wrote any singleuser/standalone application in my life,
so i never faced with single-user safety. ;)
here is what i said:
> > you need some user-dedicated or terminal-dedicated generators to doevery user(the login person) and terminal should be singular in my mind.
> > this.
> >
because of users and terminals are limited and manageble, there is no
so much risk about generator table overflow and one time used zombie
generators.
the only soft-risc is a local problem:
user may run more than one numarator based query at the same time.
a clever programmer can solve this problem without panic i think...
Regards.
Ali
FFM#208