Subject Re: [firebird-support] attempted update of read-only column
Author Dmitry Yemanov
"Chris M" <chris@...> wrote:
> Aww never mind. I think i see where. I used to be able to use
> new.fieldname to store values and use them as variables even if they
> were not getting updated. I guess I can't do this anymore.

Yep. And this is documented in the release notes.