Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Re: trying to avoid large datasets |
---|---|
Author | firebird@spence.users.panix.com |
Post date | 2006-07-08T18:22:37Z |
-----Original Message-----
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Florian Hector
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 10:25 AM
To: IB-Support
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Re: trying to avoid large datasets
From: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Florian Hector
Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 10:25 AM
To: IB-Support
Subject: Re: [firebird-support] Re: trying to avoid large datasets
>> There are lots of ways of implementing a soundex, here is one usingprobably of only little
>> Firebird stored procedures.
>>
>> http://fbtalk.net/viewtopic.php?id=182
>>
>
> sounds like what i need. i'll check it out.
>My first thought was Soundex when I read about your problem. However, it's
>or no use for you.somewhere, a" returns
>Creating the soundex for "a river somewhere" returns A6162 whereas "river
>R1625. Those two strings do not seem very similar for the soundexalgorithm.
>calculates how many single
>What you need is the "levenshtein distance". This is an algorithm that
>characters have to be swapped, added, shifted or left out to get twostrings to be the same.
>Lucene might be useful here (http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/).
>Ask aunt google for it, it returns a heap of sites.
>
>Florian