Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Reg Firebird License |
---|---|
Author | Dimitry Sibiryakov |
Post date | 2006-06-01T08:07:03Z |
On 1 Jun 2006 at 8:37, Milan Babuskov wrote:
static one. From my POV GPL contaminate whole project and this is
right. But DLL, in contrast with header files and static libraries is
a _separate_ project.
--
SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov.
> "As a special exception, if you link this library with filesI'm not sure here whether "this library" means dynamic library or
> compiled with a GNU compiler to produce an executable, this does
> not cause the resulting executable to be covered by the GNU General
> Public License. This exception does not however invalidate any
static one. From my POV GPL contaminate whole project and this is
right. But DLL, in contrast with header files and static libraries is
a _separate_ project.
--
SY, Dimitry Sibiryakov.