> I don't think this is what I am talking about. The problem I have
> run into is that some UDF dlls link BACK to fbclient.dll for some
> functionality and if your dll does not have that name, it will not
> find it. Is there a way around that problem?

Sounds evil. As Alan points out, making a connection through a UDF is
a bad idea. If as you suspect it is to do with the timestamp parsing,
then I suppose that is less evil, but maybe someone from ibphoenix can
clear that up.

Adam