At 06:17 AM 3/05/2006, Aage wrote:

>I wouldn't be quite as negative as Adam and Helen. Paradox was very
>useful and on local databases it could be very fast.

Aage, don't interpret my message as a "down" on Paradox. For desktop
and small workgroup use and as a read-only back-end to a web
application, it is still marvellous. My point was that, while the
Paradox engine is great for Paradox, it stinks as a mechanism for
delivering client/server data access to applications.

./heLen