Subject | Re: Identifying whether client library is embedded or normal |
---|---|
Author | Adam |
Post date | 2006-04-07T06:17:29Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Nando Dessena <nando@...>
wrote:
I tried to connect to the database through the embedded server.
I will do some tests later to find out whether I had my head on
backwards that day. I did not check which dll was being loaded and I
probably shouldn't just assume it loaded the renamed embedded dll in
the folder I was executing from.
Adam
wrote:
>attempted
> Adam,
>
> A> I understand these are different under-the-hood, but when I
> A> it in practice a while back it did not work. I did post a bugreport
> A> last year reporting that I had issues with both local connectionand
> A> embedded connections on 2003 server (1346568). Alexander PeshkovPerhaps he
> A> kindly pointed out the problem was with Terminal Services.
> A> was only referring to the local connection, but in any case, Imade an
> A> embedded version of our program, tested it on a XP box and itworked
> A> fine. I then zipped it and uploaded it to a TS session where itdid
> A> not work.for
>
> That bug report has to do with local connections, which don't work
> the reasons outlined there and above. Embedded connections areI mean that I received the same 'unavailable database' exception when
> entirely different beasts and I assure you they work well in any
> environment including terminal.
>
> What do you mean with "it did not work"?
I tried to connect to the database through the embedded server.
I will do some tests later to find out whether I had my head on
backwards that day. I did not check which dll was being loaded and I
probably shouldn't just assume it loaded the renamed embedded dll in
the folder I was executing from.
Adam