--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Nando Dessena <nando@...> wrote:

>
> Elmar,
> I am replying here because for some reason I don't see the message you
> replied to.
>
> >> I even discover that if firebird embedded would optionally create

only

> >> *one* superserver instance on the first loading into memory - it

will be

> >> a new feature ;)
>
> adding the TCP server code to fbembed, together with an API to start
> and stop listening would be enough. Then one application in the

group will

> host the server & database engine for the others to use.

Hi Nando,

Can you explain the difference between your proposed shared embedded
architecture and running Superserver as an application in a usability
perspective? I may be looking at it incorrectly, but I am having
trouble seeing what it would achieve that can't already be done with a
normal superserver running as an application?

Adam