Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Active Directory Controller |
---|---|
Author | The Wogster |
Post date | 2006-03-05T15:29:21Z |
yuppski wrote:
should be setup so that only the server and the DBA can access the files
themselves, otherwise, someone will screw it up.
W
> --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Doug ChamberlinFirebird users do not need read/write access to databases, in fact they
> <dougchamberlin@...> wrote:
>
>>At 12:05 PM 3/5/2006 +0000, yuppski wrote:
>>
>>>My Network Admin has asked me if Firebird can use the "Active
>>>Directory Controller" as part of MS Server 2003.
>>>
>>>Does anyone know if this is possible ?
>>
>>Use it for what exactly?
>>
>
>
> To install Firebird and put several databases on for read write access.
>
> Would there be any issues for the above senario if "Active
> Directory Controller" was part of ther server setup. I dont know what
> it will do exactly other than the fact of user access.
>
should be setup so that only the server and the DBA can access the files
themselves, otherwise, someone will screw it up.
W