Subject | Re: Best suited RAID for Firebird ? |
---|---|
Author | Marius popa |
Post date | 2006-02-09T09:58:44Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Sudheer Palaparambil"
<sudheer.clt@...> wrote:
trow drives in another system and life goes on.
Yes it could be slower than hw raid but cpu is doing nothing anyway on
server.
I religiously use raid-5 on data i care , too many drives die in an
terrible death. (Ibm Death Stars anyone ?)
A few weeks ago i replaced all system with another one moving only
the drives , We had
random crashes and seems that memory was the problem (bad memory) , In
the process
old system sparked some fire (short circuit). So i took the drives and
put them in my system with no problems then they landed the final
system (nforce2+amd barton2600+dual channel 1GByte memory as bonus)
In the end: Software Raid is better in some ways (it has some minuses
too: not so fast)
<sudheer.clt@...> wrote:
>We use software raid-5 , if motherboard is going away , then i can
> Hello,
>
> Which RAID is best suited for Firebird (Linux). Software or Hardware
trow drives in another system and life goes on.
Yes it could be slower than hw raid but cpu is doing nothing anyway on
server.
I religiously use raid-5 on data i care , too many drives die in an
terrible death. (Ibm Death Stars anyone ?)
A few weeks ago i replaced all system with another one moving only
the drives , We had
random crashes and seems that memory was the problem (bad memory) , In
the process
old system sparked some fire (short circuit). So i took the drives and
put them in my system with no problems then they landed the final
system (nforce2+amd barton2600+dual channel 1GByte memory as bonus)
In the end: Software Raid is better in some ways (it has some minuses
too: not so fast)