Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Firebird database portability |
---|---|
Author | Christopher Chan |
Post date | 2006-11-30T04:22:49Z |
> What has MySQL got to do with Firebird? Just because something isduh, nothing, just an example of what I had in mind when I said 'machine
> possible on one does not mean it is a good idea on the other. Even if
> it is a bad idea under both, that does not mean that you will suffer
> the same consequences.
independent'.
>I see we have gone into tit for tat mode.
> Oh, and I am impressed that you have hundreds of thousands of rows, it
> is not like anyone else here deals with that much data.
>FYI, that gazillion row user account information database was at my
> Yes, contradicting Nando is my goal in life? Seriously get a grip.
>
> The security database is a special database that one does not normally
> just copy around. It is usually not going to be particularly large
> either compared to your hundred gazzillion row user account
> information database, so I don't see the problem in including two on
> your CD.
previous job and was but an example of the complete safety of copying
offline mysql databases around. When I am done, the app will be on
SF.net and hopefully you firebird zealots won't shoot yourselves in the
foot trying to get firebird more exposure or included with an OS.
Geez, just trying to get clear information on the nature of the database
files is so hard. Ah well, at least I got answers and this is definitely
better treatment than what some newbies on the qmail list get.
Have a nice day Adam.
Christopher