Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: FireBird 2: Max length of names for tables, fields, constraints, etc |
---|---|
Author | Uwe Grauer |
Post date | 2006-11-26T04:11:56Z |
Nols Smit wrote:
using Firebird should be possible.
Uwe
> Thanks for the replies. The reason why I'm asked the question:If you wait for the integration of sqlalchemy into django,
>
> I stumbled across Django (http://www.djangoproject.com/).
>
> Django was developed at World Online, the Web department of a newspaper in Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
>
> Quoted from their FAQS (http://www.djangoproject.com/documentation/faq/)
> "World Online has been using Django for more than three years. Sites built on Django have weathered traffic spikes of over one million hits an hour and a number of Slashdottings. Yes, it's quite stable."
>
> But it seems it's bounded to the build-in SQLite 3, PostgreSQL and MySQL (where's my pack of Valoid).
>
> According to this posting (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1261), the max. length of 31 chars for table names, etc. is the problem why FireBird can't be used.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Nols Smit
>
using Firebird should be possible.
Uwe