Subject | Re: [firebird-support] update take manu time |
---|---|
Author | Luiz Rafael Culik Guimaraes |
Post date | 2006-11-24T13:11:44Z |
Alexander
physical reads than SS, I don't know how performant is an USB Falsh
drive in Win 98 (does it support USB 2.0 ?)
terminal numbers is repeted( terminal is unique)
Regards
Luiz
>How much records are updated by this query ?Just 1
>If you have a million records with ID_TERMINAL = 8 I think it's quitebecouse is an standalone machine, no connection from others machines
>fast :-) I wont call W98 a server :-)
>Why run classic on it ? Is it a SMP machine ? I suppose if you run it on
>W98 it is a very small database with few users, so I would choose SS
>instead.
> any idea to speed up this query?So far CS has a separated cache for each connection it will do more
>
>
physical reads than SS, I don't know how performant is an USB Falsh
drive in Win 98 (does it support USB 2.0 ?)
>But I think the main concern should be how much records are filtered byJust One, this table only store data needed for an specific terminal, and no
>your WHERE clause.
terminal numbers is repeted( terminal is unique)
Regards
Luiz