Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Ambiguous fields in version 1.5.3 |
---|---|
Author | Dmitry Yemanov |
Post date | 2006-10-20T11:20:06Z |
Josef Gschwendtner wrote:
references T1.xx, so there's no ambiguity for the engine.
Dmitry
>No, it shouldn't fail. The compiled BLR of your procedure explicitly
> Now the problem arises:
> =======================
> We have been able to add a new field "xx" in table T2 without any
> problem (I think adding new field "xx" in T2 should fail with an
> appropriate message).
references T1.xx, so there's no ambiguity for the engine.
> That there is a problem with this database we found out doing aWhat _exactly_ problems?
> backup/restore of this database.
> The restore failed because of some weird problems.
Dmitry