Subject | RE: [firebird-support] whats the opposite of first? |
---|---|
Author | Helen Borrie |
Post date | 2006-10-18T16:57:10Z |
At 11:25 AM 18/10/2006, you wrote:
recursive calls to SELECT FIRST to get the nth, followed by the
n-1th, followed by the n-2nd...etc...that's what I call horrible
(from a performance POV).
for the styles of retrieval I'm used to.
./heLen
>Helen,Erm, not that derived tables are horrible (they are not!) but
>
> > You want to return a descending set that has its rows in ascending
> > order, don't you? :-) With derived table support in Fb 2.0, it is
> > doable (if horrible!)
>
>Why do you say horrible?
>
>I have been using derived tables and they are dream!!!
recursive calls to SELECT FIRST to get the nth, followed by the
n-1th, followed by the n-2nd...etc...that's what I call horrible
(from a performance POV).
>They've simplified my life more times than I can remember.I believe that. :-)
>IMHO, they are the best feature that has been added toI believe that too; though I don't have any particular need for them
>Firebird/Interbase since I first started with IB (12+ years ago)
for the styles of retrieval I'm used to.
./heLen
>Sean
>
>
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Resources item
>on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !
>
>Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com
>
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>