Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Should I use classic or superserver? |
---|---|
Author | Mitch Peek |
Post date | 2006-10-13T12:26:41Z |
Kevin Stanton wrote:
then, and leave superserver as it is, but with firebird as the lone
process on that machine ( also win2003 but single processor 2 gig of ram.)
Thanks again,
Mitch
>Classic certainly helped a couple of ugly reports I have but..Thanks, perhaps I will move the middle tier processes off the db server
>
>
>
>I had a problem with Classic on a W2K3 duel processor server. It kept
>freezing up periodically to the point where I had to uninstalled classic and
>install superserver.
>
>The problem went away. This was using V1.53. If memory serves, seemed like
>the spawned processes would sometimes be left hanging out there (in task
>manager).
>
>Kevin
>
>
>
>
then, and leave superserver as it is, but with firebird as the lone
process on that machine ( also win2003 but single processor 2 gig of ram.)
Thanks again,
Mitch