Subject Re: [firebird-support] Re: Exact timestamp w/o using UDF?
Author Ann W. Harrison
Joe Martinez wrote:
> At this point, I think I'm just going to go ahead and use the
> getExactTimestamp UDF.

A generator would use less CPU and be more reliable. Generators
(aka sequences) are now a feature of standard SQL and many other
databases provide them, so you're not cutting yourself off from
migration by using them.