Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Exact timestamp w/o using UDF? |
---|---|
Author | Ann W. Harrison |
Post date | 2006-10-10T15:19:25Z |
Joe Martinez wrote:
(aka sequences) are now a feature of standard SQL and many other
databases provide them, so you're not cutting yourself off from
migration by using them.
Regards,
Ann
>A generator would use less CPU and be more reliable. Generators
> At this point, I think I'm just going to go ahead and use the
> getExactTimestamp UDF.
(aka sequences) are now a feature of standard SQL and many other
databases provide them, so you're not cutting yourself off from
migration by using them.
Regards,
Ann