Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Performance tuning large FDB |
---|---|
Author | Daniel Rail |
Post date | 2006-01-20T13:44:59Z |
Hi,
At January 20, 2006, 9:19 AM, Jan Bakuwel wrote:
disk. Now, Firebird will try to use the memory before using the disk.
allocation is per connection, while for Superserver that allocation is
per database(no matter how many connections). And, having more than
10,000 page cache will actually reduce your performance, because of
how the code was written, but I think that has been improved for
Firebird 2.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior Software Developer
ACCRA Consultants Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)
At January 20, 2006, 9:19 AM, Jan Bakuwel wrote:
> Hoi Ali,They are. Prior to Firebird 1.5, if sorting was needed it was done on
> Wouw, you respond quickly! :-)
>> FB has not any sort file size paramater if i know correctly, and
>> not required.
>>
>> These config paramaters and sort in RAM, written and added by
>> D.Yemanov a few years ago.
> I don't understand. These are not FB parameters?
disk. Now, Firebird will try to use the memory before using the disk.
> They are in the FBAnd they do affect the memory allocation. And, for Classic the memory
> config file... (and seem to have an effect on the amount of memory FB
> allocates)?
allocation is per connection, while for Superserver that allocation is
per database(no matter how many connections). And, having more than
10,000 page cache will actually reduce your performance, because of
how the code was written, but I think that has been improved for
Firebird 2.
--
Best regards,
Daniel Rail
Senior Software Developer
ACCRA Consultants Inc. (www.accra.ca)
ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)