| Subject | Re: [firebird-support] default field value retrospective behaviour | 
|---|---|
| Author | Dmitry Yemanov | 
| Post date | 2005-08-19T09:56:32Z | 
"Ivan Prenosil" <Ivan.Prenosil@...> wrote:
will still contain NULLs in this column. Perhaps nobody would notice the
difference though.
Second, this hack may disappear in future versions (at least I always voted
for that).
Dmitry
            >First, I wouldn't say this is exactly what he needs, because in fact records
> If you add *both* DEFAULT clause and NOT NULL constraint
> you will get what you need.
will still contain NULLs in this column. Perhaps nobody would notice the
difference though.
Second, this hack may disappear in future versions (at least I always voted
for that).
Dmitry