Subject | Re: [firebird-support] UDF: ib_util_malloc vs. malloc |
---|---|
Author | Pavel Menshchikov |
Post date | 2005-08-07T06:09:49Z |
Hello vandy899,
v> Sorry to ask again, but what is the reason to use ib_util_malloc in a
v> UDF that one declares FREE_IT to firebird? (I can't get firebird to
v> like a UDF that has ib_util_malloc in it, but when I used malloc the
v> problems 'mysteriously' disappeared. I'd say it couldn't dynamically
v> link it... because ib_util_malloc isn't there! But ib_util_malloc
v> isn't declared in libfbclient.so (strings libfbclient.so | grep
v> ib_util_malloc), so what do I link to get ib_util_malloc?
Probably, ib_util.so (in Windows FB version its name is ib_util.dll, I
don't know *nix name exactly)?
--
HTH
Best regards,
Pavel Menshchikov
http://www.ls-software.com
v> Sorry to ask again, but what is the reason to use ib_util_malloc in a
v> UDF that one declares FREE_IT to firebird? (I can't get firebird to
v> like a UDF that has ib_util_malloc in it, but when I used malloc the
v> problems 'mysteriously' disappeared. I'd say it couldn't dynamically
v> link it... because ib_util_malloc isn't there! But ib_util_malloc
v> isn't declared in libfbclient.so (strings libfbclient.so | grep
v> ib_util_malloc), so what do I link to get ib_util_malloc?
Probably, ib_util.so (in Windows FB version its name is ib_util.dll, I
don't know *nix name exactly)?
--
HTH
Best regards,
Pavel Menshchikov
http://www.ls-software.com