Subject Re: [firebird-support] Images blobs in separate table
Author Steve Wiser
Our number of images is much smaller, but we basically ran into the same
filesystem limitations as you did. Once we hit around 2,000-3,000 files
in a single directory it would take a long time to access it. Our
largest image db is a little over 80 GB and stores around 400,000 images
(tiff and pdf). So far it has worked quite well and gives us a lot of
control over access and user rights and that kind of thing without going
to our network admins.

-steve

On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 10:31 +0200, Ivan Prenosil wrote:

> > Background:
> > I have been reading a lot of posts on whether or not to store image
> > files in blobs. From what I've read the major issue with this is
> that
> > queries can be/are slowed by the blob. The common way to handle
> > images
> > is to store the image in the file system and a reference to it in a
> > column. This works in most cases, but in this particular case I
> have
> > such a high volume of images that filesystem limitations come into
> > play.
> >
> > Image description: 2-page tiff aprox. size 24k
> > Current image count: 25,550,000
> > Daily addition: 7,000 +-
> >
> > Questions:
> >
> > 1. If the image files/blobs were stored separate from the data in
> > their
> > own table, would there be an impact on overall database performance?
>
> If the blobs are larger than db page size, then they will be stored
> on separate pages anyway, so there is no point in creating another
> table.
>
> >
> > 2. Can Firebird handle this volume of data?
>
> Can't say, my biggest database with pictures in blobs was 70GB,
> and it worked without problems.
>
> Ivan
> http://www.volny.cz/iprenosil/interbase/
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Visit http://firebird.sourceforge.net and click the Resources item
> on the main (top) menu. Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !
>
> Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]