Brenden Walker wrote:

>
> Thanks, we worked around the problem for now by dropping indenting and
> extra spaces around operators (saved 10k on a 69k script). Not sure how
> this type of thing would divide up, but certainly worth looking into.
>

So apparently the blr was smaller than the source - I'm not sure where
the limit on the source comes from... but there are lots of places in
the code where lengths are kept in shorts. Database users were much
less ambitious ten years ago.

Cheers,


Ann