Subject | Re: Stored procedures vs Dynamic SQl |
---|---|
Author | women_lover_best |
Post date | 2005-07-17T03:37:51Z |
thanks daniel..
for our project..i want to go for dynamic sql ..using a product like
llbgen..i feel stored procedures are a pain and difficult to maintain
especially if database design changes a lot..and i dont think getting
database desin right first time ever happens..yur take on this?
regards
vishal
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Rail <daniel@a...>
wrote:
for our project..i want to go for dynamic sql ..using a product like
llbgen..i feel stored procedures are a pain and difficult to maintain
especially if database design changes a lot..and i dont think getting
database desin right first time ever happens..yur take on this?
regards
vishal
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Daniel Rail <daniel@a...>
wrote:
> Hi,SQL's..is
>
> At July 14, 2005, 02:47, women_lover_best wrote:
>
> > thanks for replying..
> > My situation..
> > does firebird saves execution plan both for Sp and dynamic
> > there a performance difference?the
>
> Firebird does save(cache) the execution plan of a prepared DML for
> duration of the connection(not just the transaction), unless youplan
> explicitly unprepare the DML statement. And that cached execution
> is only available within that connection only.group.
>
> This was reply on top of what I said in the Firebird Architect
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Daniel Rail
> Senior Software Developer
> ACCRA Consultants Inc. (www.accra.ca)
> ACCRA Med Software Inc. (www.filopto.com)